Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K3
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#11 of 2271.3 score
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#13 of 2251.7 score

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K3
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader85.47100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.3-xhigh · 28,234 output tokens / case81.0295% of row best · percent · kimi-k3 · 13,647 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Meta · previewMuse Spark 1.3Verified Sep 4, 2026
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K3
DeveloperMetaMoonshot AI
FamilyMuse SparkKimi K3
ModelMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K3
VersionMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K3
Lifecyclepreviewactive
Released2026-09-022026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown1,049K
Total parametersUnknown2.8T
Active parametersUnknown104B
LicenseUnknownother
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, toolschat, generation, reasoning

12 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Muse Spark 1.3 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.3

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsdeveloper peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3 FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3?+

Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced input price: $2.85 per million tokens. Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced output price: $14.25 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.3 is — and Kimi K3 is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+

Kimi K3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Muse Spark 1.3 is not marked open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K3 understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.3 is documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.3 is — and Kimi K3 is —.

Do Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3?+

Muse Spark 1.3 has 0 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback