Muse Spark 1.2 vs Grok Build 0.1
At a Glance
| Compare | Muse Spark 1.2Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #1 of 44$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $2.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 256K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 81.88100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.2-xhigh · 18,700 output tokens / case | 71.0987% of row best · percent · grok-build-0.1 · 980 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Muse Spark 1.2 | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | xAI |
| Family | Muse Spark | Grok Build |
| Model | Muse Spark 1.2 | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Muse Spark 1.2 | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | preview | preview |
| Released | 2026-08-05 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 256K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Muse Spark 1.2 vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.2 and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Grok Build 0.1?+
Only Grok Build 0.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only Grok Build 0.1 has a directly sourced output price: $2.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.2 or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.2 is — and Grok Build 0.1 is 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.2 or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Muse Spark 1.2 or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Muse Spark 1.2 and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.2 or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.2 is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Muse Spark 1.2 and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.2 or Grok Build 0.1?+
Muse Spark 1.2 has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Grok Build 0.1 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.2 or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.