Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #22 of 36$0.161 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · leader | -3.1396% of row best · score · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview; 95% CI [-4.00806078, -2.24630473]; sessions 83248; observations 2709356; rank 40 | 0.97100% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [-0.15615379, 2.09143176]; sessions 18416; observations 735300; rank 29 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,480.1099% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1476.89767236, 1483.30025658]; votes 102763; rank 11 | 1,488.47100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1478.00612479, 1498.93408698]; votes 3244; rank 8 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,295.3999% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1289.75236576, 1301.03738662]; votes 39412; rank 17 | 1,304.12100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1289.37421867, 1318.87511042]; votes 1844; rank 12 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 81.66100% of row best · percent · gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high · 13,380 output tokens / case | 81.88100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.2-xhigh · 18,700 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties | 0 benchmark wins | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Muse Spark |
| Model | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
| Version | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
| Lifecycle | preview | preview |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-08-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
11 comparable fields · 6 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Gemini 3.1 Pro Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2 FAQs
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro has a directly sourced input price: $2.00 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3.1 Pro has a directly sourced output price: $12.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Muse Spark 1.2 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.1 Pro is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2 understand images?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.1 Pro is 66K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.
Do Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.2 has 0, so Gemini 3.1 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.