DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 10, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader4.88100% of row best · score · Deepseek V4.1 Flash (Max); 95% CI [3.54852933, 6.21109128]; sessions 20080; observations 2295632; rank 12-1.7794% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [-2.69255217, -0.84918781]; sessions 33094; observations 1437075; rank 32
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader83.20100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4.1-flash-max · 36,355 output tokens / case81.8898% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.2-xhigh · 18,700 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.2
DeveloperDeepSeekMeta
FamilyDeepseek V4 1Muse Spark
ModelDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.2
VersionDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.2
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-09-102026-08-05
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049KUnknown
Total parameters763.2BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, visionchat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools
Architecture designCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)Unknown
Backbone parameters552000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during decode16000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during prefill8000000000 parametersUnknown
Pre-training corpus45000000000000 tokensUnknown
Reasoning effort range1–100Unknown
Routed experts per MoE layer384 expertsUnknown
Routed experts per token6 expertsUnknown
Transformer layers40 layersUnknown

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.2

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.15 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $0.60 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 393K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.2 has 0, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback