Muse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-5.2

At a Glance

Compare
GPT-5.2OpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#33 of 4649.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#28 of 44$0.161 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#34 of 3844.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.75Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$14.00Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported400K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2GPT-5.2
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,489.44100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1478.95697715, 1499.92080617]; votes 3227; rank 111,412.4395% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1409.21136225, 1415.65317114]; votes 78967; rank 125
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,303.88100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1289.13624882, 1318.62565115]; votes 1841; rank 141,229.4494% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1223.25930119, 1235.62760198]; votes 18997; rank 68
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.88100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.2-xhigh · 18,700 output tokens / case79.2197% of row best · percent · gpt-5.2-2025-12-11-high · 11,512 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above3 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMuse Spark 1.2GPT-5.2
DeveloperMetaOpenAI
FamilyMuse SparkGpt 5 2
ModelMuse Spark 1.2GPT-5.2
VersionMuse Spark 1.2GPT-5.2
Lifecyclepreviewactive
Released2026-08-052025-12-11
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-08-31
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown400K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.2

GPT-5.2 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.2

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-5.2 FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-5.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.2 and GPT-5.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-5.2?+

Only GPT-5.2 has a directly sourced input price: $1.75 per million tokens. Only GPT-5.2 has a directly sourced output price: $14.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-5.2?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.2 is — and GPT-5.2 is 400K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-5.2?+

Muse Spark 1.2 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-5.2 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight; GPT-5.2 is not marked open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.2 and GPT-5.2 understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input; GPT-5.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-5.2?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.2 is — and GPT-5.2 is 128K.

Do Muse Spark 1.2 and GPT-5.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-5.2?+

Muse Spark 1.2 has 0 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.2 has 2, so GPT-5.2 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-5.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback