Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.32Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.28Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-Plus
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader-2.98100% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.1; 95% CI [-3.52464364, -2.43839720]; sessions 109338; observations 4434474; rank 33-6.0897% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Plus; 95% CI [-7.29245632, -4.87295146]; sessions 20905; observations 993739; rank 40
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,464.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1455.86175356, 1473.53929177]; votes 4885; rank 181,444.1499% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1435.12302267, 1453.16578005]; votes 4591; rank 30
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,480.17100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1475.34892554, 1484.99642998]; votes 27615; rank 151,454.2098% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 39
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,294.16100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1286.17018729, 1302.15601223]; votes 8447; rank 211,277.8199% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1270.28208926, 1285.34488566]; votes 10656; rank 31
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above4 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-Plus
DeveloperMetaQwen
FamilyMuse SparkQwen3 7 Plus
ModelMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-Plus
VersionMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-Plus
Lifecyclepreviewactive
Released2026-07-09Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-plus

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a directly sourced input price: $0.32 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a directly sourced output price: $1.28 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.1 is 1,000K and Qwen3.7 Plus is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.1 is — and Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K.

Do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Plus has 4, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback