Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
At a Glance
| Compare | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | Qwen3.7 PlusQwen |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.32Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.28Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader | -2.98100% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.1; 95% CI [-3.52464364, -2.43839720]; sessions 109338; observations 4434474; rank 33 | -6.0897% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Plus; 95% CI [-7.29245632, -4.87295146]; sessions 20905; observations 993739; rank 40 |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,464.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1455.86175356, 1473.53929177]; votes 4885; rank 18 | 1,444.1499% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1435.12302267, 1453.16578005]; votes 4591; rank 30 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,480.17100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1475.34892554, 1484.99642998]; votes 27615; rank 15 | 1,454.2098% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 39 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,294.16100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1286.17018729, 1302.15601223]; votes 8447; rank 21 | 1,277.8199% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1270.28208926, 1285.34488566]; votes 10656; rank 31 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 4 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Qwen |
| Family | Muse Spark | Qwen3 7 Plus |
| Model | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Version | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | 2026-07-09 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus FAQs
Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+
Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a directly sourced input price: $0.32 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a directly sourced output price: $1.28 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.1 is 1,000K and Qwen3.7 Plus is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight.
Can Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus understand images?+
Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.1 is — and Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K.
Do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus support reasoning and tool use?+
Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+
Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Plus has 4, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.