Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Why this pair: Consecutive Meta Muse Spark agent models

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · statistical tie-0.7398% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.1; 95% CI [-1.36365010, -0.10505611]; sessions 87115; observations 3236537; rank 340.97100% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [-0.15615379, 2.09143176]; sessions 18416; observations 735300; rank 29
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,479.0399% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1473.99485495, 1484.06002682]; votes 23768; rank 141,488.47100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1478.00612479, 1498.93408698]; votes 3244; rank 8
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,292.6799% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1283.99834736, 1301.34176251]; votes 6769; rank 211,304.12100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1289.37421867, 1318.87511042]; votes 1844; rank 12
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader78.5796% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.1-xhigh · 13,652 output tokens / case81.88100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.2-xhigh · 18,700 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 3 ties0 benchmark wins1 benchmark winOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Meta · previewMuse Spark 1.1Verified Sep 3, 2026
Meta · previewMuse Spark 1.2Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

CuratedIndexable
FieldMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.2
DeveloperMetaMeta
FamilyMuse SparkMuse Spark
ModelMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.2
VersionMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.2
Lifecyclepreviewpreview
Released2026-07-092026-08-05
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000KUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownUnknown
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

12 comparable fields · 3 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.2

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All audio comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.1 is 1,000K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.1 is — and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Do Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.2 has 0, a tie.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback