Muse Spark 1.1 vs Mistral Small 4 119B 2603
At a Glance
| Compare | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | Mistral Small 4 119B 2603Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.15Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.60Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Muse Spark 1.1 | Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Family | Muse Spark | Mistral Small 4 119b 2603 |
| Model | Muse Spark 1.1 | Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 |
| Version | Muse Spark 1.1 | Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | 2026-07-09 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 119.4B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 6.5B |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 FAQs
Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
Only Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has a directly sourced input price: $0.15 per million tokens. Only Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has a directly sourced output price: $0.60 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has the larger sourced context window. Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Muse Spark 1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 be self-hosted?+
Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is open weight.
Can Muse Spark 1.1 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 understand images?+
Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.1 is — and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is —.
Do Muse Spark 1.1 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 support reasoning and tool use?+
Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Mistral Small 4 119B 2603: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has 1, so Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.