Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#25 of 4660.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#15 of 44$0.063 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#11 of 3859.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$6.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K500K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Grok 4.5
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader-2.9894% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.1; 95% CI [-3.52464364, -2.43839720]; sessions 109338; observations 4434474; rank 332.92100% of row best · score · Grok 4.5; 95% CI [1.93207740, 3.90928463]; sessions 38146; observations 1942877; rank 19
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,464.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1455.86175356, 1473.53929177]; votes 4885; rank 181,451.9699% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1443.26182849, 1460.65626012]; votes 4965; rank 26
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,480.17100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1475.34892554, 1484.99642998]; votes 27615; rank 151,450.1398% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1445.44268767, 1454.81726995]; votes 30103; rank 45
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,294.16100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1286.17018729, 1302.15601223]; votes 8447; rank 211,288.54100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1280.47745270, 1296.60872281]; votes 8355; rank 24
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader78.5798% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.1-xhigh · 13,652 output tokens / case80.01100% of row best · percent · grok-4.5 · 10,517 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified80.7698% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.1 (thinking) · 6,037 output tokens / case82.23100% of row best · points · Grok 4.5 · 2,688 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties1 benchmark win2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMuse Spark 1.1Grok 4.5
DeveloperMetaxAI
FamilyMuse SparkGrok 4
ModelMuse Spark 1.1Grok 4.5
VersionMuse Spark 1.1Grok 4.5
Lifecyclepreviewactive
Released2026-07-092026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K500K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownXai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Grok 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5 FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.5?+

Only Grok 4.5 has a directly sourced input price: $2.00 per million tokens. Only Grok 4.5 has a directly sourced output price: $6.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.5?+

Muse Spark 1.1 has the larger sourced context window. Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K and Grok 4.5 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.5?+

Grok 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.5 understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; Grok 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.1 is — and Grok 4.5 is —.

Do Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.5?+

Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.5 has 1, so Grok 4.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback