Muse Spark 1.1 vs GPT-5.4

At a Glance

Compare
GPT-5.4OpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#14 of 4672.8 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#36 of 44$0.274 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#25 of 3850.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.50Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$15.00Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K1,050K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1GPT-5.4
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader-2.9896% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.1; 95% CI [-3.52464364, -2.43839720]; sessions 109338; observations 4434474; rank 331.26100% of row best · score · GPT 5.4 (High); 95% CI [0.45972893, 2.06967586]; sessions 80406; observations 3735057; rank 24
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,464.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1455.86175356, 1473.53929177]; votes 4885; rank 181,471.00100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4; 95% CI [1464.96841782, 1477.04032901]; votes 33331; rank 14
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,480.17100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1475.34892554, 1484.99642998]; votes 27615; rank 151,452.6498% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4; 95% CI [1448.87114809, 1456.41035855]; votes 63526; rank 41
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,294.16100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1286.17018729, 1302.15601223]; votes 8447; rank 211,292.51100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4; 95% CI [1285.77825721, 1299.23452617]; votes 21188; rank 22
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader78.5795% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.1-xhigh · 13,652 output tokens / case82.38100% of row best · percent · gpt-5.4-xhigh · 18,273 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified80.7694% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.1 (thinking) · 6,037 output tokens / case85.60100% of row best · points · GPT-5.4 (xhigh) · 10,941 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties1 benchmark win2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMuse Spark 1.1GPT-5.4
DeveloperMetaOpenAI
FamilyMuse SparkGpt 5 4
ModelMuse Spark 1.1GPT-5.4
VersionMuse Spark 1.1GPT-5.4
Lifecyclepreviewactive
Released2026-07-092026-03-05
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-08-31
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,050K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

GPT-5.4 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.4

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.1 vs GPT-5.4 FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or GPT-5.4 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and GPT-5.4, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or GPT-5.4?+

Only GPT-5.4 has a directly sourced input price: $2.50 per million tokens. Only GPT-5.4 has a directly sourced output price: $15.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or GPT-5.4?+

GPT-5.4 has the larger sourced context window. Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K and GPT-5.4 supports 1,050K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or GPT-5.4?+

GPT-5.4 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 or GPT-5.4 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; GPT-5.4 is not marked open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 and GPT-5.4 understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; GPT-5.4 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or GPT-5.4?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.1 is — and GPT-5.4 is 128K.

Do Muse Spark 1.1 and GPT-5.4 support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.4: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or GPT-5.4?+

Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.4 has 2, so GPT-5.4 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or GPT-5.4?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback