Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.1875Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.6525Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral-Medium-3.5-128B
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,287.1791% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1282.91290700, 1291.42929740]; votes 39359; rank 2471,420.58100% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 104
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,141.5793% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1132.52682180, 1150.61627536]; votes 6937; rank 1061,222.05100% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 71
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner2 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral-Medium-3.5-128B
DeveloperMetaMistral AI
FamilyLlama 4 Maverick 17b 128e InstructMistral Medium 3 5 128b
ModelLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral-Medium-3.5-128B
VersionLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral-Medium-3.5-128B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-04-05Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K262K
Total parameters401.6B127.7B
Active parameters17BUnknown
Licenseotherother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessOpenrouter (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B FAQs

Is Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Only Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.1875 per million tokens. Only Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.6525 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct supports 1,000K and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight.

Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B understand images?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is — and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is —.

Do Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback