Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B
At a Glance
| Compare | Mistral Medium 3.5 128BMistral AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.1875Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.6525Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,287.1791% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1282.91290700, 1291.42929740]; votes 39359; rank 247 | 1,420.58100% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 104 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,141.5793% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1132.52682180, 1150.61627536]; votes 6937; rank 106 | 1,222.05100% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 71 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 2 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Family | Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct | Mistral Medium 3 5 128b |
| Model | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B |
| Version | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 401.6B | 127.7B |
| Active parameters | 17B | Unknown |
| License | other | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B FAQs
Is Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+
Only Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.1875 per million tokens. Only Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.6525 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct supports 1,000K and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B understand images?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is — and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is —.
Do Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B support reasoning and tool use?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.