Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs o3

At a Glance

Compare
o3OpenAI
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$4.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K200K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMistral-Medium-3.5-128Bo3
DeveloperMistral AIOpenAI
FamilyMistral Medium 3 5 128bO3
ModelMistral-Medium-3.5-128Bo3
VersionMistral-Medium-3.5-128Bo3
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-04-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2024-06-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K200K
Total parameters127.7BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

o3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/o3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs o3 FAQs

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or o3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and o3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or o3?+

Only o3 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only o3 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or o3?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has the larger sourced context window. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K and o3 supports 200K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or o3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or o3 be self-hosted?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight; o3 is not marked open weight.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and o3 understand images?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input; o3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or o3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is — and o3 is 100K.

Do Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and o3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. o3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or o3?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0 sourced provider routes; o3 has 2, so o3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or o3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback