Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs OCR 4.1
At a Glance
| Compare | Mistral Medium 3.5 128BMistral AI | OCR 4.1Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B | OCR 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Family | Mistral Medium 3 5 128b | Mistral OCR |
| Model | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B | OCR 4.1 |
| Version | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B | OCR 4.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-07-16 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Image, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | 127.7B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | other | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Mistral AI (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | bounding-box-extraction, document-ai, ocr, structured-annotations |
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities
OCR 4.1 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs OCR 4.1 FAQs
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or OCR 4.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and OCR 4.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or OCR 4.1?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or OCR 4.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is 262K and OCR 4.1 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or OCR 4.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or OCR 4.1 be self-hosted?+
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight; OCR 4.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and OCR 4.1 understand images?+
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input; OCR 4.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or OCR 4.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is — and OCR 4.1 is —.
Do Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and OCR 4.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. OCR 4.1: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or OCR 4.1?+
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0 sourced provider routes; OCR 4.1 has 1, so OCR 4.1 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or OCR 4.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.