Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs GPT-5.1

At a Glance

Compare
GPT-5.1OpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#37 of 4625.7 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 17.1–50.5
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.25Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$10.00Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K400K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGPT-5.1
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,420.58100% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 1041,422.57100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.1; 95% CI [1418.95842118, 1426.18777801]; votes 42982; rank 100
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,222.0599% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 711,235.08100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.1; 95% CI [1227.35514387, 1242.80648733]; votes 10205; rank 65
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties0 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGPT-5.1
DeveloperMistral AIOpenAI
FamilyMistral Medium 3 5 128bGpt 5 1
ModelMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGPT-5.1
VersionMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGPT-5.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-11-13
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2024-09-30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K400K
Total parameters127.7BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

GPT-5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs GPT-5.1 FAQs

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-5.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and GPT-5.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-5.1?+

Only GPT-5.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.25 per million tokens. Only GPT-5.1 has a directly sourced output price: $10.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-5.1?+

GPT-5.1 has the larger sourced context window. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K and GPT-5.1 supports 400K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-5.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: Neither model leads outside the score tolerance on the verified common benchmarks.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-5.1 be self-hosted?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight; GPT-5.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and GPT-5.1 understand images?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input; GPT-5.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-5.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is — and GPT-5.1 is 128K.

Do Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and GPT-5.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-5.1?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.1 has 2, so GPT-5.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-5.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback