MiniMax M3 vs Grok 4.6

Market Position

LiveBench Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost

Full ranking →
Efficiency FrontierLiveBench overall · output estimate
Upper-left is better
xAIDeepSeekZ.aiMiniMaxOpenAIQwenGoogle DeepMindMoonshot AIAnthropic
LiveBench quality versus score-adjusted output costEach dot is a reviewed current model configuration and is colored by developer. Higher means a better LiveBench overall score. Farther left means lower estimated output cost after adjusting by the score. A dotted line connects the non-dominated frontier observations. When models are selected, their sourced families remain prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and an orange ring identifies each selected model.$0.0050$0.010$0.020$0.050$0.100$0.200$0.5006873788287Grok Build 0.1GLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna (max)DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.6 Sol (max)Score-adjusted output cost per LiveBench case (log) →LiveBench overall →
The dotted frontier connects measured, non-dominated current-model observations. With a selection, sourced families stay prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and orange rings mark the selected model or models. Family lines connect models only when their sourced family and generation match. Cost is estimated from published output tokens and the lowest current USD output rate; it excludes input, caching, batch discounts, and provider-specific benchmark execution details.

This current-market view appears only when both compared models are reviewed current models with publisher-reported LiveBench token accounting and current sourced USD output rates.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Grok 4.6
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,435.2099% of row best · rating · minimax-m3; 95% CI [1430.86827835, 1439.53977389]; votes 44544; rank 771,443.75100% of row best · rating · grok-4.6-high; 95% CI [1433.62910542, 1453.86294509]; votes 3453; rank 55
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader70.2686% of row best · percent · minimax-m3 · 15,530 output tokens / case82.17100% of row best · percent · grok-4.6 · 16,154 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie0 benchmark wins1 benchmark winOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
MiniMax · activeMiniMax M3Verified Aug 28, 2026
xAI · activeGrok 4.6Verified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldMiniMax-M3Grok 4.6
DeveloperMiniMaxxAI
FamilyMinimax M3Grok 4
ModelMiniMax-M3Grok 4.6
VersionMiniMax-M3Grok 4.6
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-01Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-02-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K500K
Total parameters427BUnknown
Active parameters23BUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

13 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

MiniMax M3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.28
Output price$1.10
Serving providers5
Canonical IDMiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3

Grok 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.6

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

MiniMax M3 vs Grok 4.6 FAQs

Is MiniMax M3 or Grok 4.6 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MiniMax M3 and Grok 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Grok 4.6?+

MiniMax M3 is $0.28 and Grok 4.6 is $2.00 per million tokens, so MiniMax M3 is cheaper on this metric. MiniMax M3 is $1.10 and Grok 4.6 is $6.00 per million tokens, so MiniMax M3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, MiniMax M3 or Grok 4.6?+

MiniMax M3 has the larger sourced context window. MiniMax M3 supports 1,049K and Grok 4.6 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, MiniMax M3 or Grok 4.6?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can MiniMax M3 or Grok 4.6 be self-hosted?+

MiniMax M3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. MiniMax M3 is open weight; Grok 4.6 is not marked open weight.

Can MiniMax M3 and Grok 4.6 understand images?+

MiniMax M3 is documented with image input; Grok 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, MiniMax M3 or Grok 4.6?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. MiniMax M3 is — and Grok 4.6 is —.

Do MiniMax M3 and Grok 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+

MiniMax M3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, MiniMax M3 or Grok 4.6?+

MiniMax M3 has 5 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.6 has 1, so MiniMax M3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, MiniMax M3 or Grok 4.6?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback