Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E vs OpenVLA 7B
At a Glance
| Compare |  OpenVLA 7BOpenVLA Research Team | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 10,000K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E | OpenVLA 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | OpenVLA Research Team |
| Family | Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e | OpenVLA |
| Model | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E | OpenVLA 7B |
| Version | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E | 7B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2024-06-13 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Robot state |
| Output modalities | Text | Robot action |
| Context window | 10,000K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | 108.6B | 7B |
| Active parameters | 17B | Unknown |
| License | other | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | cross-embodiment, fine-tuning, generalist-manipulation |
| Robotics model type | Unknown | Vision-language-action model |
| Action representation | Unknown | Tokenized actions decoded to continuous robot controls |
| Control architecture | Unknown | Fused SigLIP and DINOv2 visual encoder with Llama 2 7B backbone |
| Inference location | Unknown | Flexible |
| Native control rate (Hz) | Unknown | Unknown |
| Supported embodiments | Unknown | WidowX, Google Robot, Franka Panda |
| Training data | Unknown | 970,000 robot manipulation trajectories from Open X-Embodiment described by the authors. |
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Capabilities
OpenVLA 7B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E vs OpenVLA 7B FAQs
Is Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E or OpenVLA 7B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E and OpenVLA 7B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E or OpenVLA 7B?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E or OpenVLA 7B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E is 10,000K and OpenVLA 7B is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E or OpenVLA 7B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E or OpenVLA 7B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E is open weight; OpenVLA 7B is open weight.
Can Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E and OpenVLA 7B understand images?+
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E is documented with image input; OpenVLA 7B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E or OpenVLA 7B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E is — and OpenVLA 7B is —.
Do Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E and OpenVLA 7B support reasoning and tool use?+
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E: tool calling and image input. OpenVLA 7B: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E or OpenVLA 7B?+
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E has 1 sourced provider route; OpenVLA 7B has 0, so Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E or OpenVLA 7B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.