Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,287.1387% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1282.87677682, 1291.39199009]; votes 39349; rank 243 | 1,479.03100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1473.99485495, 1484.06002682]; votes 23768; rank 14 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,141.4788% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1132.42029588, 1150.51619722]; votes 6936; rank 102 | 1,292.67100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1283.99834736, 1301.34176251]; votes 6769; rank 21 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Meta |
| Family | Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct | Muse Spark |
| Model | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Version | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-07-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 401.6B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 17B | Unknown |
| License | other | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs
Is Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Only Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.20 per million tokens. Only Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.696 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is 1,000K and Muse Spark 1.1 is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is — and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.
Do Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.