Llama 3.1 405B vs Muse Spark 1.1

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
DeveloperMetaMeta
FamilyLlama 3 1 405bMuse Spark
ModelLlama-3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
VersionLlama-3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2024-07-232026-07-09
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K1,000K
Total parameters405.9BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

Llama 3.1 405B Capabilities

generation
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 405B vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 405B or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 405B and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 405B or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Muse Spark 1.1 has the larger sourced context window. Llama 3.1 405B supports 131K and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B or Muse Spark 1.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 405B or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+

Llama 3.1 405B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Llama 3.1 405B is open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 405B and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+

Llama 3.1 405B is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 405B or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 3.1 405B is — and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.

Do Llama 3.1 405B and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 405B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 405B or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Llama 3.1 405B has 1 sourced provider route; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Llama 3.1 405B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 405B or Muse Spark 1.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback