Seed 2.1 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405B

At a Glance

Compare
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported131K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldSeed 2.1 ProLlama-3.1-405B
DeveloperByteDance SeedMeta
FamilySeed 2 1Llama 3 1 405b
ModelSeed 2.1 ProLlama-3.1-405B
VersionSeed 2.1 ProLlama-3.1-405B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-232024-07-23
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown131K
Total parametersUnknown405.9B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownllama3.1
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessUnknownTogether Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsgeneration

Seed 2.1 Pro Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-2.1-pro

Llama 3.1 405B Capabilities

generation
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Seed 2.1 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405B FAQs

Is Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.1 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.1 Pro is — and Llama 3.1 405B is 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B be self-hosted?+

Llama 3.1 405B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 2.1 Pro is not marked open weight; Llama 3.1 405B is open weight.

Can Seed 2.1 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B understand images?+

Seed 2.1 Pro is documented with image input; Llama 3.1 405B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.1 Pro is — and Llama 3.1 405B is —.

Do Seed 2.1 Pro and Llama 3.1 405B support reasoning and tool use?+

Seed 2.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Llama 3.1 405B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B?+

Seed 2.1 Pro has 0 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.1 405B has 1, so Llama 3.1 405B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.1 405B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback