Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Sonar Pro

At a Glance

Compare
Sonar ProPerplexity
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$3.00Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$15.00Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K200K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-405B-InstructSonar Pro
DeveloperMetaPerplexity
FamilyLlama 3 1 405b InstructSonar
ModelLlama-3.1-405B-InstructSonar Pro
VersionLlama-3.1-405B-InstructSonar Pro
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-07-23Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K200K
Total parameters405.9BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Openrouter (Standard), Perplexity (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, citations, search

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct

Sonar Pro Capabilities

chatcitationssearch
Serving providers2
Canonical IDperplexity/sonar-pro

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Sonar Pro FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Sonar Pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Sonar Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Sonar Pro?+

Only Sonar Pro has a directly sourced input price: $3.00 per million tokens. Only Sonar Pro has a directly sourced output price: $15.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Sonar Pro?+

Sonar Pro has the larger sourced context window. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct supports 131K and Sonar Pro supports 200K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Sonar Pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Sonar Pro be self-hosted?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is open weight; Sonar Pro is not marked open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Sonar Pro understand images?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is not documented with image input; Sonar Pro is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Sonar Pro?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is — and Sonar Pro is —.

Do Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Sonar Pro support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct: tool calling. Sonar Pro: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Sonar Pro?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Sonar Pro has 2, so Sonar Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Sonar Pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback