Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Pixtral Large

At a Glance

Compare
Pixtral LargeMistral AI
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-405B-InstructPixtral Large
DeveloperMetaMistral AI
FamilyLlama 3 1 405b InstructPixtral Large
ModelLlama-3.1-405B-InstructPixtral Large
VersionLlama-3.1-405B-InstructPixtral Large
Lifecycleactivedeprecated
Released2024-07-232024-11-18
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parameters405.9BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesNo
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct

Pixtral Large Capabilities

chatgenerationstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/pixtral-large-2411

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Pixtral Large FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Pixtral Large better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Pixtral Large, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Pixtral Large?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Pixtral Large?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is 131K and Pixtral Large is 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Pixtral Large?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Pixtral Large be self-hosted?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is open weight; Pixtral Large is not marked open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Pixtral Large understand images?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is not documented with image input; Pixtral Large is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Pixtral Large?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is — and Pixtral Large is —.

Do Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Pixtral Large support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct: tool calling. Pixtral Large: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Pixtral Large?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Pixtral Large has 0, so Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Pixtral Large?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback