Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs GLM 5

At a Glance

Compare
GLM 5Z.ai
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.92Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K203K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-405B-InstructGLM-5
DeveloperMetaZ.ai
FamilyLlama 3 1 405b InstructGlm 5
ModelLlama-3.1-405B-InstructGLM-5
VersionLlama-3.1-405B-InstructGLM-5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-07-23Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K203K
Total parameters405.9B753.9B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct

GLM 5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDzai-org/GLM-5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs GLM 5 FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or GLM 5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and GLM 5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or GLM 5?+

Only GLM 5 has a directly sourced input price: $0.60 per million tokens. Only GLM 5 has a directly sourced output price: $1.92 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or GLM 5?+

GLM 5 has the larger sourced context window. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct supports 131K and GLM 5 supports 203K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or GLM 5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or GLM 5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is open weight; GLM 5 is open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and GLM 5 understand images?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is not documented with image input; GLM 5 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or GLM 5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is — and GLM 5 is —.

Do Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and GLM 5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct: tool calling. GLM 5: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or GLM 5?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; GLM 5 has 4, so GLM 5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or GLM 5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback