Kimi K3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#13 of 5773.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete#5 of 5785.9 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#19 of 27$0.163 per LiveBench case#15 of 27$0.104 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9#12 of 2750.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete#5 of 2760.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.239Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026$2.00Openai ↗ · Sep 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$11.936Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026$10.00Openai ↗ · Sep 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,050K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkKimi-K3GPT-6.1 Sol
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-613c385b0c93 · verified_score · leader94.5096% of row best · percent · Kimi K3 (Max)98.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-6.1 Sol (XHigh)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-be40992860f9 · verified_score · leader60.4264% of row best · percent · Kimi K3 (Max)94.17100% of row best · percent · GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader81.0294% of row best · percent · kimi-k3 · 13,647 output tokens / case86.14100% of row best · percent · gpt-6.1-sol-max · 10,375 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified82.23100% of row best · points · Kimi K3 (max) · 21,438 output tokens / case82.44100% of row best · points · GPT-6.1 Sol (max) · 21,221 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost

Full ranking →
Efficiency FrontierLiveBench overall · output estimate
Upper-left is better
xAIZ.aiOpenAIMiniMaxDeepSeekMistral AIQwenGoogle DeepMindMoonshot AIAnthropic
LiveBench quality versus score-adjusted output costEach dot is a reviewed major-model configuration and is colored by developer. Higher means a better LiveBench overall score. Farther left means lower estimated output cost after adjusting by the score. A dotted line connects the non-dominated frontier observations. When models are selected, their sourced families remain prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and an orange ring identifies each selected model.$0.0050$0.010$0.050$0.100$0.500$1.006873798489Grok Build 0.1GLM 5.3 FlashGPT-6 Luna (max)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)GPT-6.1 Sol (max)GPT-6 Astra (max)Claude Fable 5.1Score-adjusted output cost per LiveBench case (log) →LiveBench overall →
The dotted frontier connects measured, non-dominated major-model observations. With a selection, sourced families stay prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and orange rings mark the selected model or models. Family lines connect models only when their sourced family and generation match. Cost is estimated from published output tokens and the lowest current USD output rate; it excludes input, caching, batch discounts, and provider-specific benchmark execution details.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldKimi-K3GPT-6.1 Sol
DeveloperMoonshot AIOpenAI
FamilyKimi K3Gpt 6
ModelKimi-K3GPT-6.1 Sol
VersionKimi-K3GPT-6.1 Sol
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-162026-09-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-04-30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,050K
Total parameters2.78TUnknown
Active parameters104BUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, tools
Data residencyUnknownUS, EU
Default snapshotUnknowngpt-6.1-sol
Maximum input tokensUnknown922000
Multi-agentUnknownResponses API beta
Reasoning effortUnknownlow, medium, high, xhigh, max
Regional processing premiumUnknown10% where available
Supported API routesUnknownv1/responses, v1/chat/completions, v1/batch
Supported toolsUnknownweb_search, file_search, image_generation, code_interpreter, hosted_shell, apply_patch, skills, computer_use, mcp, tool_search
Tier 1 rate limitsUnknown500 RPM; 500,000 TPM
Tier 2 rate limitsUnknown5,000 RPM; 1,000,000 TPM
Tier 3 rate limitsUnknown5,000 RPM; 2,000,000 TPM
Tier 4 rate limitsUnknown10,000 RPM; 4,000,000 TPM
Tier 5 rate limitsUnknown15,000 RPM; 40,000,000 TPM
Tool calling routeUnknownResponses API only

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

GPT-6.1 Sol Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6.1-sol

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol FAQs

Is Kimi K3 or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K3 and GPT-6.1 Sol, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

Kimi K3 is $0.239 and GPT-6.1 Sol is $2.00 per million tokens, so Kimi K3 is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K3 is $11.936 and GPT-6.1 Sol is $10.00 per million tokens, so GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K3 supports 1,048,576 tokens and GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1,050,000 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K3 or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

GPT-6.1 Sol leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Kimi K3 or GPT-6.1 Sol be self-hosted?+

Kimi K3 is documented as self-hostable; GPT-6.1 Sol is documented as not self-hostable. Kimi K3 is open weight; GPT-6.1 Sol is not marked open weight.

Can Kimi K3 and GPT-6.1 Sol understand images?+

Kimi K3 is documented with image input; GPT-6.1 Sol is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K3 or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

GPT-6.1 Sol has a sourced maximum output of 128,000 tokens; Kimi K3's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Kimi K3 and GPT-6.1 Sol support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. GPT-6.1 Sol: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K3 or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

Kimi K3 has 5 sourced provider routes; GPT-6.1 Sol has 2, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K3 or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback