DeepSeek V4 Pro Base vs Kimi K3
At a Glance
| Compare | DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseDeepSeek | Kimi K3Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #13 of 5773.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #19 of 27$0.163 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9 | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #12 of 2750.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.239Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $11.936Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Base | Kimi-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Moonshot AI |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Pro Base | Kimi K3 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Base | Kimi-K3 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Base | Kimi-K3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2026-07-16 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 1.6T | 2.78T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 104B |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation | chat, generation, reasoning |
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base Capabilities
Kimi K3 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base vs Kimi K3 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Kimi K3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Kimi K3?+
Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.239 per million tokens. Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced output price: $11.936 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Kimi K3?+
Both models have the same sourced context window: 1,048,576 tokens each.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Kimi K3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Kimi K3 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is not documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Kimi K3?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base: none of these features are definitively sourced. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Kimi K3?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has 0 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or Kimi K3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.