Granite 4.1 30B vs Sonar Deep Research

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.00Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$8.00Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K128K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldgranite-4.1-30bSonar Deep Research
DeveloperIBMPerplexity
FamilyGranite 4 1 30bSonar
Modelgranite-4.1-30bSonar Deep Research
Versiongranite-4.1-30bSonar Deep Research
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-29Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K128K
Total parameters28.9BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenrouter (Standard), Perplexity (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, citations, reasoning, research, search

Granite 4.1 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.1-30b

Sonar Deep Research Capabilities

chatcitationsreasoningresearchsearch
Serving providers2
Canonical IDperplexity/sonar-deep-research

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite 4.1 30B vs Sonar Deep Research FAQs

Is Granite 4.1 30B or Sonar Deep Research better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite 4.1 30B and Sonar Deep Research, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.1 30B or Sonar Deep Research?+

Only Sonar Deep Research has a directly sourced input price: $2.00 per million tokens. Only Sonar Deep Research has a directly sourced output price: $8.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Granite 4.1 30B or Sonar Deep Research?+

Granite 4.1 30B has the larger sourced context window. Granite 4.1 30B supports 131K and Sonar Deep Research supports 128K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite 4.1 30B or Sonar Deep Research?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite 4.1 30B or Sonar Deep Research be self-hosted?+

Granite 4.1 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Granite 4.1 30B is open weight; Sonar Deep Research is not marked open weight.

Can Granite 4.1 30B and Sonar Deep Research understand images?+

Granite 4.1 30B is not documented with image input; Sonar Deep Research is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite 4.1 30B or Sonar Deep Research?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite 4.1 30B is — and Sonar Deep Research is —.

Do Granite 4.1 30B and Sonar Deep Research support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite 4.1 30B: tool calling. Sonar Deep Research: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite 4.1 30B or Sonar Deep Research?+

Granite 4.1 30B has 0 sourced provider routes; Sonar Deep Research has 2, so Sonar Deep Research has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite 4.1 30B or Sonar Deep Research?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback