Seed 2.1 Pro vs Granite 4.1 30B

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
ByteDance Seed · activeSeed 2.1 ProVerified Sep 3, 2026
IBM · activeGranite 4.1 30BVerified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldSeed 2.1 Progranite-4.1-30b
DeveloperByteDance SeedIBM
FamilySeed 2 1Granite 4 1 30b
ModelSeed 2.1 Progranite-4.1-30b
VersionSeed 2.1 Progranite-4.1-30b
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-232026-04-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown131K
Total parametersUnknown28.9B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessUnknownUnknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, tools

11 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Seed 2.1 Pro Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-2.1-pro

Granite 4.1 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.1-30b

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Seed 2.1 Pro vs Granite 4.1 30B FAQs

Is Seed 2.1 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.1 Pro and Granite 4.1 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.1 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.1 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.1 Pro is — and Granite 4.1 30B is 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.1 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Seed 2.1 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B be self-hosted?+

Granite 4.1 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 2.1 Pro is not marked open weight; Granite 4.1 30B is open weight.

Can Seed 2.1 Pro and Granite 4.1 30B understand images?+

Seed 2.1 Pro is documented with image input; Granite 4.1 30B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.1 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.1 Pro is — and Granite 4.1 30B is —.

Do Seed 2.1 Pro and Granite 4.1 30B support reasoning and tool use?+

Seed 2.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Granite 4.1 30B: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.1 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B?+

Seed 2.1 Pro has 0 sourced provider routes; Granite 4.1 30B has 0, a tie.

Which offers better value, Seed 2.1 Pro or Granite 4.1 30B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback