Granite 4.1 30B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
Rankinggranite-4.1-30bQwen3.8-Max
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
IBM · activeGranite 4.1 30BVerified Aug 28, 2026
Qwen · activeQwen3.8 MaxVerified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
Fieldgranite-4.1-30bQwen3.8-Max
DeveloperIBMQwen
FamilyGranite 4 1 30bQwen3 8 Max
Modelgranite-4.1-30bQwen3.8-Max
Versiongranite-4.1-30bQwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-29Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K1,000K
Total parameters28.9B2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

12 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Granite 4.1 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.1-30b

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$1.65
Output price$4.951
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite 4.1 30B vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite 4.1 30B and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced input price: $1.65 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced output price: $4.951 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Granite 4.1 30B supports 131K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

Granite 4.1 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Granite 4.1 30B is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can Granite 4.1 30B and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

Granite 4.1 30B is not documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite 4.1 30B is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.

Do Granite 4.1 30B and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite 4.1 30B: tool calling. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Granite 4.1 30B has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback