Granite 4.1 30B vs Kimi K2 Instruct
At a Glance
| Compare |  Kimi K2 InstructMoonshot AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.57Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $2.30Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 131K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | granite-4.1-30b | Kimi-K2-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | IBM | Moonshot AI |
| Family | Granite 4 1 30b | Kimi K2 Instruct |
| Model | granite-4.1-30b | Kimi-K2-Instruct |
| Version | granite-4.1-30b | Kimi-K2-Instruct |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-04-29 | 2025-07-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 28.9B | 1T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 32B |
| License | apache-2.0 | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, tools |
Granite 4.1 30B Capabilities
Kimi K2 Instruct Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Granite 4.1 30B vs Kimi K2 Instruct FAQs
Is Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K2 Instruct better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite 4.1 30B and Kimi K2 Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K2 Instruct?+
Only Kimi K2 Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.57 per million tokens. Only Kimi K2 Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $2.30 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K2 Instruct?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Granite 4.1 30B is 131K and Kimi K2 Instruct is 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K2 Instruct?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K2 Instruct be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Granite 4.1 30B is open weight; Kimi K2 Instruct is open weight.
Can Granite 4.1 30B and Kimi K2 Instruct understand images?+
Granite 4.1 30B is not documented with image input; Kimi K2 Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K2 Instruct?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite 4.1 30B is — and Kimi K2 Instruct is —.
Do Granite 4.1 30B and Kimi K2 Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+
Granite 4.1 30B: tool calling. Kimi K2 Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K2 Instruct?+
Granite 4.1 30B has 0 sourced provider routes; Kimi K2 Instruct has 2, so Kimi K2 Instruct has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K2 Instruct?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.