GR00T N1.7 3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →
Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGR00T N1.7 3BNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
DeveloperNVIDIANVIDIA
FamilyIsaac GR00TNvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning
ModelGR00T N1.7 3BNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
VersionN1.7NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-072026-08-11
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Robot stateText
Output modalitiesRobot actionText
Context windowUnknown1,049K
Total parameters3B30B
Active parametersUnknown3B
Licenseapache-2.0openmdw-1.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableNoYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownFireworks Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiescross-embodiment, dexterous-manipulation, whole-body-control, fine-tuningagents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools
Robotics model typeVision-language-action modelUnknown
Action representationPredictive chunks of relative joint motionsUnknown
Control architectureVision-language backbone with action expertUnknown
Inference locationOn deviceUnknown
Native control rate (Hz)UnknownUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnitree G1, AgiBot Genie-1, Fourier GR-1, bimanual manipulation platformsUnknown
Training dataMixture of real teleoperation, synthetic robot data, and internet-scale video described by NVIDIA.Unknown

GR00T N1.7 3B Capabilities

cross-embodimentdexterous-manipulationwhole-body-controlfine-tuning
Model typeVision-language-action model
InferenceOn device
Action representationPredictive chunks of relative joint motions
Supported embodiments4
Canonical IDnvidia/GR00T-N1.7-3B

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningtools
Model typeUnknown
InferenceUnknown
Action representationUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknown
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GR00T N1.7 3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B FAQs

Is GR00T N1.7 3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GR00T N1.7 3B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GR00T N1.7 3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, GR00T N1.7 3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. GR00T N1.7 3B is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GR00T N1.7 3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can GR00T N1.7 3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. GR00T N1.7 3B is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight.

Can GR00T N1.7 3B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B understand images?+

GR00T N1.7 3B is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GR00T N1.7 3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GR00T N1.7 3B is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is —.

Do GR00T N1.7 3B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+

GR00T N1.7 3B: image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GR00T N1.7 3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

GR00T N1.7 3B has 0 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, GR00T N1.7 3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback