GR00T N1.7 3B vs Qwen3.8 Max

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#10 of 4679.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 52.8–86.1
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#23 of 44$0.107 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#6 of 3863.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 50.0–66.7
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →
Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGR00T N1.7 3BQwen3.8-Max
DeveloperNVIDIAQwen
FamilyIsaac GR00TQwen3 8 Max
ModelGR00T N1.7 3BQwen3.8-Max
VersionN1.7Qwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-07Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Robot stateText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesRobot actionText
Context windowUnknown1,000K
Total parameters3B2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableNoYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiescross-embodiment, dexterous-manipulation, whole-body-control, fine-tuningagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision
Robotics model typeVision-language-action modelUnknown
Action representationPredictive chunks of relative joint motionsUnknown
Control architectureVision-language backbone with action expertUnknown
Inference locationOn deviceUnknown
Native control rate (Hz)UnknownUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnitree G1, AgiBot Genie-1, Fourier GR-1, bimanual manipulation platformsUnknown
Training dataMixture of real teleoperation, synthetic robot data, and internet-scale video described by NVIDIA.Unknown

GR00T N1.7 3B Capabilities

cross-embodimentdexterous-manipulationwhole-body-controlfine-tuning
Model typeVision-language-action model
InferenceOn device
Action representationPredictive chunks of relative joint motions
Supported embodiments4
Canonical IDnvidia/GR00T-N1.7-3B

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Model typeUnknown
InferenceUnknown
Action representationUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknown
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GR00T N1.7 3B vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is GR00T N1.7 3B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GR00T N1.7 3B and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GR00T N1.7 3B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced input price: $1.65 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced output price: $4.951 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, GR00T N1.7 3B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. GR00T N1.7 3B is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GR00T N1.7 3B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can GR00T N1.7 3B or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

GR00T N1.7 3B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. GR00T N1.7 3B is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can GR00T N1.7 3B and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

GR00T N1.7 3B is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GR00T N1.7 3B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GR00T N1.7 3B is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.

Do GR00T N1.7 3B and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

GR00T N1.7 3B: image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GR00T N1.7 3B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

GR00T N1.7 3B has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, GR00T N1.7 3B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback