GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoGPT-5.6 Sol
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-b2e2a31b3d53 · verified_score · leader20.7121% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (Medium)97.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Sol (XHigh)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-326661568d5f · verified_score · leader2.613% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (High)92.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,319.8491% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1312.99438214, 1326.68844296]; votes 8128; rank 2141,454.69100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1449.58093424, 1459.80348090]; votes 23153; rank 35
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,159.2491% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1148.19623356, 1170.28699037]; votes 3950; rank 961,276.90100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1267.71657009, 1286.08047215]; votes 5837; rank 30
ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader61.6271% of row best · points · GPT-5 nano · 7,465 output tokens / case87.35100% of row best · points · GPT-5.6 Sol (default) · 2,955 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins5 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
OpenAI · activeGPT-5 NanoVerified Sep 3, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-5.6 SolVerified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGPT-5 NanoGPT-5.6 Sol
DeveloperOpenAIOpenAI
FamilyGpt 5Gpt 5 6
ModelGPT-5 NanoGPT-5.6 Sol
VersionGPT-5 NanoGPT-5.6 Sol
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-08-07Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2024-05-312026-02-16
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window400,0001,050,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

14 comparable fields · 6 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

GPT-5 Nano Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.025
Output price$0.20
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5-nano

GPT-5.6 Sol Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$10.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.6-sol

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-5.6 Sol FAQs

Is GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.6 Sol, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

GPT-5 Nano is $0.025 and GPT-5.6 Sol is $2.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5 Nano is $0.20 and GPT-5.6 Sol is $10.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5 Nano supports 400,000 and GPT-5.6 Sol supports 1,050,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

GPT-5.6 Sol leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5 Nano is not marked open weight; GPT-5.6 Sol is not marked open weight.

Can GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.6 Sol understand images?+

GPT-5 Nano is documented with image input; GPT-5.6 Sol is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-5 Nano is 128,000 and GPT-5.6 Sol is 128,000.

Do GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.6 Sol support reasoning and tool use?+

GPT-5 Nano: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.6 Sol: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

GPT-5 Nano has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.6 Sol has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback