GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-5.6 Sol
At a Glance
| Compare |  GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.025Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $4.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.20Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $20.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 400K | 1,050K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-613c385b0c93 · verified_score · leader | 20.7121% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (Medium) | 97.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Sol (XHigh) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-be40992860f9 · verified_score · leader | 2.613% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (High) | 92.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader | 1,319.9491% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1313.09185399, 1326.78218151]; votes 8132; rank 232 | 1,457.06100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1452.73485432, 1461.39117296]; votes 40442; rank 43 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader | 1,159.2290% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1148.16831669, 1170.26403282]; votes 3929; rank 113 | 1,281.39100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1273.98131322, 1288.80759068]; votes 10907; rank 35 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 4 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Family | Gpt 5 | Gpt 5 6 |
| Model | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.6 Sol |
| Version | GPT-5 Nano | GPT-5.6 Sol |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-05-31 | 2026-02-16 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 400K | 1,050K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
GPT-5 Nano Capabilities
GPT-5.6 Sol Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | vs | GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs | GPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs | GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs |  Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs | Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexity | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs |  Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | vs | Grok 4.5xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-5 Nano vs GPT-5.6 Sol FAQs
Is GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.6 Sol, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
GPT-5 Nano is $0.025 and GPT-5.6 Sol is $4.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5 Nano is $0.20 and GPT-5.6 Sol is $20.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5 Nano supports 400,000 tokens and GPT-5.6 Sol supports 1,050,000 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
GPT-5.6 Sol leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5 Nano is not marked open weight; GPT-5.6 Sol is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.6 Sol understand images?+
GPT-5 Nano is documented with image input; GPT-5.6 Sol is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
Both models have the same sourced maximum output: 128,000 tokens each.
Do GPT-5 Nano and GPT-5.6 Sol support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-5 Nano: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.6 Sol: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
GPT-5 Nano has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.6 Sol has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, GPT-5 Nano or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.