GPT-5.6 Luna vs Grok 4.3

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#31 of 4652.7 score · 3/3 sources · complete#40 of 4616.6 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 11.1–44.4
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#6 of 44$0.026 per LiveBench case#7 of 44$0.028 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#4 of 3864.8 score · 3/3 sources · complete#33 of 3846.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 43.3–59.9
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.20Openai · Sep 3, 2026$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.20Openai · Sep 3, 2026$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,050K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaGrok 4.3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,429.89100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh; 95% CI [1425.11549148, 1434.66063238]; votes 28547; rank 861,397.7398% of row best · rating · grok-4.3; 95% CI [1394.01930088, 1401.44639527]; votes 66801; rank 145
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,258.53100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh; 95% CI [1250.17799393, 1266.87249678]; votes 7793; rank 481,229.4798% of row best · rating · grok-4.3; 95% CI [1223.17337452, 1235.75913440]; votes 22688; rank 67
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader77.05100% of row best · percent · gpt-5.6-luna-max · 21,799 output tokens / case69.2790% of row best · percent · grok-4.3 · 11,184 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified84.47100% of row best · points · GPT-5.6 Luna (ultra) · 17,605 output tokens / case74.9189% of row best · points · Grok 4.3 (high) · 5,154 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above3 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGPT-5.6 LunaGrok 4.3
DeveloperOpenAIxAI
FamilyGpt 5 6Grok 4
ModelGPT-5.6 LunaGrok 4.3
VersionGPT-5.6 LunaGrok 4.3
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-06-17
Knowledge cutoff2026-02-16Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,050K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

GPT-5.6 Luna Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.6-luna

Grok 4.3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Grok 4.3 FAQs

Is GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5.6 Luna and Grok 4.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.3?+

GPT-5.6 Luna is $0.20 and Grok 4.3 is $1.25 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5.6 Luna is $1.20 and Grok 4.3 is $2.50 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.3?+

GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5.6 Luna supports 1,050K and Grok 4.3 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.3?+

GPT-5.6 Luna leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5.6 Luna is not marked open weight; Grok 4.3 is not marked open weight.

Can GPT-5.6 Luna and Grok 4.3 understand images?+

GPT-5.6 Luna is documented with image input; Grok 4.3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-5.6 Luna is 128K and Grok 4.3 is —.

Do GPT-5.6 Luna and Grok 4.3 support reasoning and tool use?+

GPT-5.6 Luna: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.3?+

GPT-5.6 Luna has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.3 has 1, so GPT-5.6 Luna has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback