GPT-5.4 Nano vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#42 of 4614.7 score · 3/3 sources · complete#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#14 of 44$0.058 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#37 of 3837.5 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.20Openai · Sep 3, 2026$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.25Openai · Sep 3, 2026$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens400K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader51.5058% of row best · percent · GPT-5.4 Nano (XHigh)89.50100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader5.699% of row best · percent · GPT-5.4 Nano (XHigh)65.14100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,372.8695% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4-nano-high; 95% CI [1369.01237938, 1376.71496043]; votes 58424; rank 1671,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,197.7395% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4-nano-high; 95% CI [1191.19602204, 1204.26778242]; votes 23906; rank 801,259.55100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1253.19837141, 1265.89693020]; votes 22925; rank 46
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins4 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGPT-5.4 NanoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperOpenAIxAI
FamilyGpt 5 4Grok 4 20
ModelGPT-5.4 NanoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionGPT-5.4 NanoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-03-17Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2025-08-31Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window400K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsgeneration, reasoning, research, tools

GPT-5.4 Nano Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.4-nano

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5.4 Nano and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

GPT-5.4 Nano is $0.20 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5.4 Nano is $1.25 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5.4 Nano supports 400K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5.4 Nano is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can GPT-5.4 Nano and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

GPT-5.4 Nano is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-5.4 Nano is 128K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do GPT-5.4 Nano and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

GPT-5.4 Nano: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

GPT-5.4 Nano has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so GPT-5.4 Nano has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback