GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
At a Glance
| Compare |  GPT-5.2OpenAI | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #33 of 4649.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #5 of 4685.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #28 of 44$0.161 per LiveBench case | #24 of 44$0.117 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #34 of 3844.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #3 of 3865.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.75Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $2.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $14.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $10.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 400K | 1,050K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 86.1788% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2 (XHigh) | 97.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Sol (XHigh) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 52.9157% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2 (XHigh) | 92.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,401.1294% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1395.19508120, 1407.03614053]; votes 28212; rank 44 | 1,482.71100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1473.91086026, 1491.51379085]; votes 4818; rank 10 |
| LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,172.1493% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2-search-non-reasoning; 95% CI [1166.59081201, 1177.68538907]; votes 75658; rank 20 | 1,257.26100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1249.79496224, 1264.72573796]; votes 29663; rank 1 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,412.4397% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1409.21136225, 1415.65317114]; votes 78967; rank 125 | 1,455.05100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1450.16111002, 1459.93036454]; votes 27069; rank 37 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,229.4496% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1223.25930119, 1235.62760198]; votes 18997; rank 68 | 1,280.13100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1271.78485021, 1288.47570636]; votes 7729; rank 29 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 79.2193% of row best · percent · gpt-5.2-2025-12-11-high · 11,512 output tokens / case | 85.26100% of row best · percent · gpt-5.6-sol-max · 11,729 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 78.0889% of row best · points · GPT-5.2 · 4,266 output tokens / case | 87.97100% of row best · points · GPT-5.6 Sol (ultra) · 10,204 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 7 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Family | Gpt 5 2 | Gpt 5 6 |
| Model | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
| Version | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-08-31 | 2026-02-16 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 400K | 1,050K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
GPT-5.2 Capabilities
GPT-5.6 Sol Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Sol FAQs
Is GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Sol better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.6 Sol, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
GPT-5.2 is $1.75 and GPT-5.6 Sol is $2.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5.2 is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5.2 is $14.00 and GPT-5.6 Sol is $10.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Sol is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5.2 supports 400K and GPT-5.6 Sol supports 1,050K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
GPT-5.6 Sol leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 7 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Sol be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5.2 is not marked open weight; GPT-5.6 Sol is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.6 Sol understand images?+
GPT-5.2 is documented with image input; GPT-5.6 Sol is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-5.2 is 128K and GPT-5.6 Sol is 128K.
Do GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.6 Sol support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-5.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.6 Sol: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
GPT-5.2 has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.6 Sol has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.