GPT-4.1 vs GPT-5 Nano

At a Glance

Compare
GPT-4.1OpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#44 of 463.7 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 2.5–35.8#46 of 460.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 0.0–33.3
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026$0.025Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$4.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026$0.20Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,048K400K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGPT-4.1GPT-5 Nano
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader5.5027% of row best · percent · GPT-4.120.71100% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (Medium)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader0.4216% of row best · percent · GPT-4.12.61100% of row best · percent · GPT-5 Nano (High)
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboardv4-ede5081a24bc · overall_accuracy · leader39.38100% of row best · percent · GPT-4.1-2025-04-14 (Prompt)27.5570% of row best · percent · GPT-5-nano-2025-08-07 (Prompt)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,382.77100% of row best · rating · gpt-4.1-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1379.06025569, 1386.47352582]; votes 49941; rank 1571,319.7295% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1312.87607943, 1326.57003978]; votes 8128; rank 218
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,210.03100% of row best · rating · gpt-4.1-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1203.34343280, 1216.70707848]; votes 41012; rank 741,159.1096% of row best · rating · gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1148.05999135, 1170.13906838]; votes 3948; rank 100
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above3 benchmark winsOverall lead2 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGPT-4.1GPT-5 Nano
DeveloperOpenAIOpenAI
FamilyGpt 4 1Gpt 5
ModelGPT-4.1GPT-5 Nano
VersionGPT-4.1GPT-5 Nano
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-08-07
Knowledge cutoff2024-06-012024-05-31
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,048K400K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

GPT-4.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-4.1

GPT-5 Nano Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5-nano

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GPT-4.1 vs GPT-5 Nano FAQs

Is GPT-4.1 or GPT-5 Nano better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-4.1 and GPT-5 Nano, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5 Nano?+

GPT-4.1 is $1.00 and GPT-5 Nano is $0.025 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric. GPT-4.1 is $4.00 and GPT-5 Nano is $0.20 per million tokens, so GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5 Nano?+

GPT-4.1 has the larger sourced context window. GPT-4.1 supports 1,048K and GPT-5 Nano supports 400K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5 Nano?+

GPT-4.1 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can GPT-4.1 or GPT-5 Nano be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-4.1 is not marked open weight; GPT-5 Nano is not marked open weight.

Can GPT-4.1 and GPT-5 Nano understand images?+

GPT-4.1 is documented with image input; GPT-5 Nano is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5 Nano?+

GPT-5 Nano has the larger sourced maximum output: GPT-4.1 supports 33K and GPT-5 Nano supports 128K output tokens.

Do GPT-4.1 and GPT-5 Nano support reasoning and tool use?+

GPT-4.1: tool calling and image input. GPT-5 Nano: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5 Nano?+

GPT-4.1 has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5 Nano has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5 Nano?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback