GPT-4.1 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

At a Glance

Compare
GPT-4.1OpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#44 of 463.7 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 2.5–35.8#42 of 4614.7 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#14 of 44$0.058 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#37 of 3837.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026$0.20Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$4.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026$1.25Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,048K400K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGPT-4.1GPT-5.4 Nano
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader5.5011% of row best · percent · GPT-4.151.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.4 Nano (XHigh)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader0.427% of row best · percent · GPT-4.15.69100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.4 Nano (XHigh)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,382.77100% of row best · rating · gpt-4.1-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1379.06025569, 1386.47352582]; votes 49941; rank 1571,372.8699% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4-nano-high; 95% CI [1369.01237938, 1376.71496043]; votes 58424; rank 167
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,210.03100% of row best · rating · gpt-4.1-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1203.34343280, 1216.70707848]; votes 41012; rank 741,197.7399% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4-nano-high; 95% CI [1191.19602204, 1204.26778242]; votes 23906; rank 80
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie1 benchmark win2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGPT-4.1GPT-5.4 Nano
DeveloperOpenAIOpenAI
FamilyGpt 4 1Gpt 5 4
ModelGPT-4.1GPT-5.4 Nano
VersionGPT-4.1GPT-5.4 Nano
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-03-17
Knowledge cutoff2024-06-012025-08-31
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,048K400K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

GPT-4.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-4.1

GPT-5.4 Nano Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.4-nano

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GPT-4.1 vs GPT-5.4 Nano FAQs

Is GPT-4.1 or GPT-5.4 Nano better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-4.1 and GPT-5.4 Nano, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

GPT-4.1 is $1.00 and GPT-5.4 Nano is $0.20 per million tokens, so GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper on this metric. GPT-4.1 is $4.00 and GPT-5.4 Nano is $1.25 per million tokens, so GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

GPT-4.1 has the larger sourced context window. GPT-4.1 supports 1,048K and GPT-5.4 Nano supports 400K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

GPT-5.4 Nano leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can GPT-4.1 or GPT-5.4 Nano be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-4.1 is not marked open weight; GPT-5.4 Nano is not marked open weight.

Can GPT-4.1 and GPT-5.4 Nano understand images?+

GPT-4.1 is documented with image input; GPT-5.4 Nano is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

GPT-5.4 Nano has the larger sourced maximum output: GPT-4.1 supports 33K and GPT-5.4 Nano supports 128K output tokens.

Do GPT-4.1 and GPT-5.4 Nano support reasoning and tool use?+

GPT-4.1: tool calling and image input. GPT-5.4 Nano: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

GPT-4.1 has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.4 Nano has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, GPT-4.1 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback