DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Phi-4-multimodal-instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.4 | #27 of 4655.4 score · 2/3-source partial | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #11 of 45$0.054 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 45-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.1 | #15 of 3856.3 score · 2/3-source intelligence | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
Ranks come from current available eligible cohorts. Intelligence may use a labeled two-of-three partial core. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Phi-4-multimodal-instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Pro | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Phi-4-multimodal-instruct |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Phi-4-multimodal-instruct |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2025-02-26 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 1.6T | 5.6B |
| Active parameters | 49B | Unknown |
| License | mit | mit |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | chat, generation |
14 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro has a directly sourced input price: $0.66 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4 Pro has a directly sourced output price: $1.5441 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,049K and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro is — and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is —.
Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6 sourced provider routes; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct has 0, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.