DeepSeek V4 Pro vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#28 of 4655.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.9–70.2UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#10 of 44$0.054 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#12 of 3858.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 49.2–65.9UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.66DeepSeek · Sep 2, 2026$0.050Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.5441Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026$0.20Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-ProNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,450.63100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro; 95% CI [1446.64622706, 1454.61308427]; votes 54130; rank 431,348.4493% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.98546755, 1353.88978012]; votes 15325; rank 195
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-ProNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
DeveloperDeepSeekNVIDIA
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProNvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16
ModelDeepSeek-V4-ProNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
VersionDeepSeek-V4-ProNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-242025-12-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-11-28
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K262K
Total parameters1.6T31.6B
Active parameters49B3.5B
Licensemitother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, reasoning, tools

DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers6
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,049K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is 1,049K.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback