DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok Build 0.1

Market Position

LiveBench Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost

Full ranking →
Efficiency FrontierLiveBench overall · output estimate
Upper-left is better
xAIDeepSeekZ.aiMiniMaxOpenAIQwenGoogle DeepMindMoonshot AIAnthropic
LiveBench quality versus score-adjusted output costEach dot is a reviewed major-model configuration and is colored by developer. Higher means a better LiveBench overall score. Farther left means lower estimated output cost after adjusting by the score. A dotted line connects the non-dominated frontier observations. When models are selected, their sourced families remain prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and an orange ring identifies each selected model.$0.0050$0.010$0.020$0.050$0.100$0.200$0.5006873788287Grok Build 0.1GLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna (max)DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.6 Sol (max)Score-adjusted output cost per LiveBench case (log) →LiveBench overall →
The dotted frontier connects measured, non-dominated major-model observations. With a selection, sourced families stay prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and orange rings mark the selected model or models. Family lines connect models only when their sourced family and generation match. Cost is estimated from published output tokens and the lowest current USD output rate; it excludes input, caching, batch discounts, and provider-specific benchmark execution details.

This current-market view appears only when both compared models are reviewed current models with publisher-reported LiveBench token accounting and current sourced USD output rates.

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingDeepSeek-V4-ProGrok Build 0.1
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#9 of 36$0.054 per LiveBench case#1 of 36$0.0020 per LiveBench case

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-ProGrok Build 0.1
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader76.79100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro · 35,014 output tokens / case71.0993% of row best · percent · grok-build-0.1 · 980 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
DeepSeek · activeDeepSeek V4 ProVerified Aug 28, 2026
xAI · previewGrok Build 0.1Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldDeepSeek-V4-ProGrok Build 0.1
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProGrok Build
ModelDeepSeek-V4-ProGrok Build 0.1
VersionDeepSeek-V4-ProGrok Build 0.1
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-04-242026-05-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K256K
Total parameters1.6TUnknown
Active parameters49BUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

14 comparable fields · 12 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$0.66
Output price$1.5441
Serving providers6
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$1.00
Output price$2.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-build-0.1

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 and Grok Build 0.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 and Grok Build 0.1 is $2.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,049K and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback