DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3 VL Flash
At a Glance
| Compare |  DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek |  Qwen3 VL FlashQwen |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.30Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.60Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Qwen3 VL Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Pro | Qwen3 VL |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Qwen3 VL Flash |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Qwen3 VL Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-08-13 | 2026-01-22 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 1.6T | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 49B | Unknown |
| License | mit | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities
Qwen3 VL Flash Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3 VL Flash FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 VL Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3 VL Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 and Qwen3 VL Flash is $0.15 per million tokens, so Qwen3 VL Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 and Qwen3 VL Flash is $1.50 per million tokens, so Qwen3 VL Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K and Qwen3 VL Flash supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 VL Flash be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; Qwen3 VL Flash is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3 VL Flash understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; Qwen3 VL Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and Qwen3 VL Flash is —.
Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3 VL Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Qwen3 VL Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3 VL Flash has 1, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.