DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.30Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.32Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.60Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$1.28Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.7-Plus
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader4.14100% of row best · score · DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) (0813); 95% CI [3.35150819, 4.93122185]; sessions 47602; observations 4132769; rank 16-6.0890% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Plus; 95% CI [-7.29245632, -4.87295146]; sessions 20905; observations 993739; rank 40
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,443.9599% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813; 95% CI [1437.16050212, 1450.73220317]; votes 9008; rank 581,454.20100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 39
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.7-Plus
DeveloperDeepSeekQwen
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProQwen3 7 Plus
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.7-Plus
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.7-Plus
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-08-13Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters1.6TUnknown
Active parameters49BUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-plus

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.7 Plus FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K and Qwen3.7 Plus supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Plus be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Plus understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Plus support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Plus has 4, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback