DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.7 Max

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench case#13 of 44$0.057 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.30Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$1.475Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.60Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$4.425Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader4.14100% of row best · score · DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) (0813); 95% CI [3.35150819, 4.93122185]; sessions 47602; observations 4132769; rank 16-3.6393% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Max; 95% CI [-4.47002493, -2.78058186]; sessions 38392; observations 1816729; rank 34
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.91100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 36,339 output tokens / case77.5095% of row best · percent · qwen3.7-max · 12,909 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified84.68100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) · 18,462 output tokens / case81.2696% of row best · points · Qwen3.7 Max (default) · 8,636 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.7 Max
DeveloperDeepSeekQwen
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProQwen3 7
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.7 Max
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.7 Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-08-132026-05-20
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters1.6TUnknown
Active parameters49BUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Qwen3.7 Max Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-max

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.7 Max FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 and Qwen3.7 Max is $1.475 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 and Qwen3.7 Max is $4.425 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Max be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; Qwen3.7 Max is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Max understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and Qwen3.7 Max is 66K.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Qwen3.7 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Max has 4, so Qwen3.7 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback