DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Spark 1.2

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.30Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.60Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader4.14100% of row best · score · DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) (0813); 95% CI [3.35150819, 4.93122185]; sessions 47602; observations 4132769; rank 16-1.7794% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [-2.69255217, -0.84918781]; sessions 33094; observations 1437075; rank 32
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,443.9597% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813; 95% CI [1437.16050212, 1450.73220317]; votes 9008; rank 581,489.44100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1478.95697715, 1499.92080617]; votes 3227; rank 11
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.91100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 36,339 output tokens / case81.88100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.2-xhigh · 18,700 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsOverall lead1 benchmark win

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Muse Spark 1.2
DeveloperDeepSeekMeta
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProMuse Spark
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Muse Spark 1.2
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Muse Spark 1.2
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-08-132026-08-05
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049KUnknown
Total parameters1.6TUnknown
Active parameters49BUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.2

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Spark 1.2 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Spark 1.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a directly sourced input price: $1.30 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a directly sourced output price: $2.60 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Spark 1.2 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Spark 1.2 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Spark 1.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.2 has 0, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Spark 1.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback