DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.30Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.60Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K262K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader4.14100% of row best · score · DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) (0813); 95% CI [3.35150819, 4.93122185]; sessions 47602; observations 4132769; rank 16-10.8886% of row best · score · Mistral Medium 3.5; 95% CI [-12.33636331, -9.41760729]; sessions 10244; observations 358935; rank 43
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,443.95100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813; 95% CI [1437.16050212, 1450.73220317]; votes 9008; rank 581,420.5898% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 104
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
DeveloperDeepSeekMistral AI
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProMistral Medium 3 5 128b
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-08-13Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K262K
Total parameters1.6T127.7B
Active parameters49BUnknown
Licensemitother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a directly sourced input price: $1.30 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a directly sourced output price: $2.60 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback