DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.30Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026$0.10Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.60Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026$0.32Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K131K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,443.95100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813; 95% CI [1437.16050212, 1450.73220317]; votes 9008; rank 581,273.9888% of row best · rating · llama-3.3-70b-instruct; 95% CI [1270.49383309, 1277.45726344]; votes 54412; rank 262
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
DeveloperDeepSeekMeta
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProLlama 3 3 70b Instruct
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-08-132024-12-06
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K131K
Total parameters1.6T70.6B
Active parameters49BUnknown
Licensemitllama3.3
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, tools

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.10 per million tokens, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.32 per million tokens, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has 3, a tie.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback