DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs gpt-oss-120b

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.30Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.037Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.60Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.17Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K131K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,443.95100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813; 95% CI [1437.16050212, 1450.73220317]; votes 9008; rank 581,365.8795% of row best · rating · gpt-oss-120b; 95% CI [1361.49487468, 1370.23719284]; votes 29955; rank 176
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified84.68100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) · 18,462 output tokens / case68.0180% of row best · points · gpt-oss 120B (high) · 7,577 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813gpt-oss-120b
DeveloperDeepSeekOpenAI
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProGpt Oss 120b
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813gpt-oss-120b
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813gpt-oss-120b
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-08-13Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K131K
Total parameters1.6T116.8B
Active parameters49B5.1B
Licensemitapache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Serverless, Standard), Groq (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Serverless, Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

gpt-oss-120b Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers7
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-oss-120b

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs gpt-oss-120b FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or gpt-oss-120b better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and gpt-oss-120b, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or gpt-oss-120b?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 and gpt-oss-120b is $0.037 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 and gpt-oss-120b is $0.17 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or gpt-oss-120b?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K and gpt-oss-120b supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or gpt-oss-120b?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or gpt-oss-120b be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; gpt-oss-120b is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and gpt-oss-120b understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; gpt-oss-120b is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or gpt-oss-120b?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and gpt-oss-120b is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and gpt-oss-120b support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. gpt-oss-120b: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or gpt-oss-120b?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; gpt-oss-120b has 7, so gpt-oss-120b has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or gpt-oss-120b?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback