DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.0868Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.1736Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-FlashMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader1.80100% of row best · score · Deepseek V4 Flash (High) (20260731); 95% CI [1.06225523, 2.53222539]; sessions 64482; observations 6405377; rank 22-2.9895% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.1; 95% CI [-3.52464364, -2.43839720]; sessions 109338; observations 4434474; rank 33
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,431.7997% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-flash; 95% CI [1427.66110387, 1435.91557810]; votes 48887; rank 831,480.17100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1475.34892554, 1484.99642998]; votes 27615; rank 15
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader69.6789% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-flash · 34,434 output tokens / case78.57100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.1-xhigh · 13,652 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified78.0097% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Flash (xhigh) · 12,709 output tokens / case80.76100% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.1 (thinking) · 6,037 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark win2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-FlashMuse Spark 1.1
DeveloperDeepSeekMeta
FamilyDeepseek V4 FlashMuse Spark
ModelDeepSeek-V4-FlashMuse Spark 1.1
VersionDeepSeek-V4-FlashMuse Spark 1.1
Lifecycleretiredpreview
Released2026-04-242026-07-09
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters290.9BUnknown
Active parameters13BUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

DeepSeek V4 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers5
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Only DeepSeek V4 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.0868 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $0.1736 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Muse Spark 1.1 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Flash is open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash is — and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash: reasoning. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash has 5 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback