DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs Muse Spark 1.1

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseMuse Spark 1.1
DeveloperDeepSeekMeta
FamilyDeepseek V4 Flash BaseMuse Spark
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseMuse Spark 1.1
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseMuse Spark 1.1
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-04-242026-07-09
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters292BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownUnknown
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Base

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Muse Spark 1.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base supports 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Muse Spark 1.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is — and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base: none of these features are definitively sourced. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Muse Spark 1.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base has 0 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, a tie.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or Muse Spark 1.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback