DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs GLM 5.3
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Base | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #28 of 36$0.248 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Base | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Flash Base | Glm 5 3 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Base | GLM-5.3 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Base | GLM-5.3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 292B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
11 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base Capabilities
GLM 5.3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs | GLM-5.2Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs GLM 5.3 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GLM 5.3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and GLM 5.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GLM 5.3?+
Only GLM 5.3 has a directly sourced input price: $1.20 per million tokens. Only GLM 5.3 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base supports 1,049K and GLM 5.3 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GLM 5.3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GLM 5.3 be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is open weight; GLM 5.3 is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and GLM 5.3 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is not documented with image input; GLM 5.3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GLM 5.3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base is — and GLM 5.3 is 131K.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and GLM 5.3 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base: none of these features are definitively sourced. GLM 5.3: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base has 0 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.3 has 4, so GLM 5.3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash Base or GLM 5.3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.