DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 10, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepseek V4 1Grok 4 20
ModelDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-09-10Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters763.2BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, visiongeneration, reasoning, research, tools
Architecture designCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)Unknown
Backbone parameters552000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during decode16000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during prefill8000000000 parametersUnknown
Pre-training corpus45000000000000 tokensUnknown
Reasoning effort range1–100Unknown
Routed experts per MoE layer384 expertsUnknown
Routed experts per token6 expertsUnknown
Transformer layers40 layersUnknown

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.15 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.60 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 1,049K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 393K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback